संत साहित्य
Work in progress. Translations and commentary are AI-generated and may contain inaccuracies or hallucinations — please use your own judgement and check against the original sources.
संत साहित्य · Tukārām · Abhanga 2786 of 4582

Abhanga 2786

Since God is truly present in every being, treating yourself as above or below another person is a mistaken hierarchy, like trembling at a rope you mistook for a snake.

When you feel superior to someone because of your position, title, or role as a teacher or leader.
When you feel inferior around someone you consider more advanced or important than yourself.
When you notice you have gotten stuck in the habit of ranking people as better or worse than one another.

The verse

गुरुशिष्यपण । हें तों अधमलक्षण ॥१॥ भूतीं नारायण खरा । आप तैसा चि दुसरा ॥ध्रु.॥ न कळतां दोरी साप । राहूं नेंदावा तो कांप ॥२॥ तुका म्हणे गुणदोषी । ऐसें न पडावें सोसीं ॥३॥

Literal translation

Guru-śiṣya-paṇaguru-and-disciple-ness; hē tōm adhama-lakṣaṇathat is theadhama-lakṣaṇa(lowest-mark, sign-of-baseness). Bhūtīm Nārāyaṇa kharāinbhūtas(beings) Nārāyaṇa iskharā(real); āpa taisā chi dujāone's own (self) is just-the-same as thedujā(second, other). Na kaḷatām dōrī sāpanot knowing thedōrī(rope) (as)sāpa(snake); rāhūm nēdāvā tō kāmpadon't let thatkāmpa(trembling) stay. Tukā says: guṇa-dōṣī — aisē na paḍāvē sōsīminguṇa-dōṣa— don't fall into thatsōsa(habit, taste, sustained-engagement).

What it means

A striking anti-hierarchy verse. Guru-śiṣya-paṇa — hē tōm adhama-lakṣaṇaguru-and-disciple-ness — that is the lowest-mark, sign-of-baseness. This is a radical claim. The conventional-tradition values guru-śiṣya hierarchy; Tukārām marks it as adhama-lakṣaṇathe sign-of-baseness. The reasoning follows in the dhrūpada.

Bhūtīm Nārāyaṇa kharā — āpa taisā chi dujāin beings Nārāyaṇa is the real — one's own is just-the-same as the second. The reason: Nārāyaṇa is in all-beings. The ātmā in all = my own ātmā. Therefore one's-own is the-same as the other. With this advaita-recognition, guru-śiṣya hierarchy becomes adhama — it positions one being above another when they-are-the-same.

The second verse uses the classic-rope-snake image: na kaḷatām dōrī sāpa — rāhūm nēdāvā tō kāmpanot knowing the rope-as-snake — don't let that trembling stay. The Vedānta-image: in dim-light, one mistakes the rope for a snake and trembles. The kāmpa (trembling) is the symptom-of-the-error. Once one recognizes-the-rope, the trembling should be released. Tukārām applies this to the guru-śiṣya confusion: recognize the mistake; don't let the trembling stay.

The close: guṇa-dōṣī — aisē na paḍāvē sōsīmin guṇa-dōṣa — don't fall into the habit-of-suffering. Guṇa-dōṣa (the categorization of qualities-and-faults) is itself a sōsa (sustained-engagement, habit) one falls into — and it produces suffering. The guru-śiṣya hierarchy is a kind of guṇa-dōṣī judgment-making.

This verse is in tension with other Tukārām verses that honor sants and gurus (compare 2706's sant-pāya-jōḍī = bhāgya, 2757's Hari-bhakta-jīvalaga-sōyarē). The resolution is that this verse is critiquing guru-śiṣya-paṇa (the position-of-guru-vs-disciple) — not sant-honor in general. The honoring of sants is not as hierarchy but as bhāva-confluence. The adhama-lakṣaṇa is in the positional-claim of guru-over-disciple, not in the bhāva-of-honor itself.

For someone today

A striking anti-hierarchy verse to balance the sant-honoring tradition. The very notion of guru and disciple is the lowest-mark. In beings, Nārāyaṇa is real — one's own is just-the-same as the other. Not knowing rope-as-snake — don't let the trembling stay. In guṇa-dōṣa — don't fall into the habit-of-suffering. The verse is provocative — it goes against the standard-tradition that honors guru-śiṣya. The reasoning: if Nārāyaṇa is in all-beings equally, positioning one above another is adhama. The bhakta-mode is honoring without hierarchy — recognizing-the-same in the other.

मराठी: संत-सन्मानाच्या परंपरेला समतोल देणारा एक ठाशीव विषमताविरोधी अभंग. गुरु आणि शिष्य ही संकल्पनाच सर्वात हीन लक्षण आहे. सर्व प्राण्यांमध्ये नारायण खराच आहे — स्वतःचं आणि दुसऱ्याचं एकच आहे. दोरीला साप न ओळखणं — ती थरथर टिकू देऊ नकोस. गुणदोषाच्या बाबतीत — त्या सवयीत अडकू नकोस. हा अभंग भडक आहे — कारण तो गुरु-शिष्य नात्याला मान देणाऱ्या परंपरेच्या विरुद्ध जातो. तर्क असा — जर नारायण सर्व प्राण्यांमध्ये सारखाच आहे, तर एकाला दुसऱ्यापेक्षा वरचढ ठरवणं हेच हीन आहे. भक्ताची भूमिका अशी — विषमतेशिवाय आदर करणं — दुसऱ्यात स्वतःचंच रूप ओळखणं.

Where this applies